College Video Games about to Change...
nytimes.com/2009/07/04/sp...?_r=1&hp
One of the best parts about being the quarterback for Arizona State was the thrill that Sam Keller got whenever he played NCAA Football, the popular video game from Electronic Arts.

Although Keller’s name did not appear in the game, there was little doubt that he was the inspiration for the Arizona State quarterback in its 2005 edition. The virtual player shared Keller’s jersey number, 9, as well as his height, weight, skin tone, hair color and home state. The virtual quarterback even had the same playing style, as a pocket passer. “That was what made it so cool,” said Keller, who transferred to Nebraska in 2006. “It was so blatant.”

Keller has since come to view his appearance in the video game in a different light: as exploitation. He filed a class-action lawsuit this spring against Electronic Arts and the National Collegiate Athletic Association, arguing that they illegally profit from the images of college football and basketball players. Ryan Hart, a former Rutgers quarterback, filed a similar lawsuit against Electronic Arts earlier this week in a New Jersey state court.

“We signed a paper at the beginning of college saying we couldn’t benefit from our name,” said Keller, who is now 24 and living in Scottsdale, Ariz. “So why was the N.C.A.A. turning a blind eye to this and allowing EA Sports to take our likenesses and make big bucks off it?”

The N.C.A.A. has long enforced strict rules barring its athletes from cashing in on their celebrity status at the same time that it earned millions of dollars through licensing deals, like those for jerseys, that some say did just that. Now athletes are challenging in court for the right to control the use of their images.

>> added by Herbal_Minded 8 months ago

6 responses | add a response
EA probably pays the Schools.
by 805_COAM | 7 months ago
| 1 responses
They do, They pay the school, Conferences, and NCAA. Not the athletes.
by Herbal_Minded | 7 months ago
uhmm... no...

ok who the crap actually plays that stupid game any ways?!
by TheDecemberists | 8 months ago
| 1 responses
Most Gamers. It is one of the best selling video game franchises of all time...
by Herbal_Minded | 8 months ago
Sure they should, that's what I would call copyright infringement. If they base the game on a certain persons moves, playing style, and abilities, that certain person should get some of that pie.
by pjacobs51 | 8 months ago

load more responses